Skip to content
Crystal Central

Tetris Couldn't Triumph at This Gaming Ceremony — An Additional Classification Might Solve This

As any prominent honors show nears, there’s always an outcry for the addition fresh award types to honor underappreciated efforts and satisfy the spirits of followers with niche passions.

My colleague made the case advocating for terror-themed awards. It would be amazing. The same goes for tabletop games, which is a passionate advocate's mission. But they will have to forgive me for pushing forward because like all single-minded supporters, I have a cast-iron argument for why my demand remains most pressing and significant. The demand is this: It's essential to create a classification for brain-teasing titles.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Organizing artistic expressions defies precise measurement; opinions vary greatly, and it will always generate discussions resulting in unclear classifications. There’s a reason film award organizations don’t do it. However, it represents an essential concession for the industry of video games, which are so diverse it's challenging to consider them a single creative category.

To recognize the complete range of gaming accomplishments to gain proper attention, and for games of all stripes to compete fairly, specific award classifications remain vital.

Present Award Structure

Leading game ceremonies presently include genre categories for Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Between them, these award types successfully include numerous genres, allowing placement accommodating various experiences.

Not so for puzzle games. There’s simply nowhere to accommodate them. Examine these examples from outstanding current releases, each quite distinct: structural challenges from a specific release, the pulse-pounding block-matching from another release, thought-provoking social scenarios of a third title. Which classification works between these six categories? Unfortunately, nowhere.

The Representation Problem

Many instances occur outstanding logic titles released every year lacking appropriate categories at major award shows, unless they happen to qualify classification types such as Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive Indie races.

  • An iconic brain-teaser received no recognition for anything that year
  • Another creative title received no nominations during that ceremony
  • Popular arranging title got ignored in 2021
  • Just some puzzle games managed to sneak into small studio or handheld classifications

Value of Brain-Teasers

Commonly they're small games, but the art behind logic titles holds tremendous importance. Well-known matching games rank among the most-played games in the world and have been for over a decade.

The famous puzzle experience competes with well-known building titles competing to become highest-selling title ever; it additionally competes for top gaming experience. Logic titles represent cornerstones within interactive entertainment, while interacting across multiple categories.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Logic titles wouldn't face that issue. You could fill a field of five engaging, different, qualified experiences every year with ease — actually, with challenge, since numerous excellent numerous deserving experiences.

To emphasize again, these represent titles lacking appropriate categories at major gaming awards. Brain-teaser creators operate at the hard edge game development, developing some of most fundamental forms of gaming itself. Comparable to cinema stunt performers, they merit acknowledgment. Let’s not keep them waiting generations.

CS
About the author

Charles Stephens

Elara Vance is a certified crystal therapist and geologist who shares practical insights on using crystals for holistic health and mindfulness.

Crystal Central

Type to search articles.